Adventures or the Wind Waker?

[Lord O'Donnell]

Both this games are the worst of each franchise, or at least thats what is the public opinion. What do you think?

Because of having the same general characteristics, both games can enter in the poll

ZeldaWW: Awesome cartoon graphics (lets admit it they are very well designed), but the shortest and boring because of the need of traveling from one island to another. The temples arent that good, at least not like OoT, I finished the game in a few hours and the gameplay repeats itself over and over.

SFAd: Incredible graphics we cant complain about. The gameplay is almost the same during the game, one thing that saves the game is the fact that each piece of the planet has very different riddles making it harder or at least makes it a little longer. I finished it in 26 hours the first time (I suck dont you think?)

The time that took me to finish the WW was the time necesary to finish the temple, the riddles were pretty obvious and the bosses were easy, i never died in this zelda. SFA was longer and harder and the riddles were harder and not so obvious. It took me an hour to find the alpine roots af the 2nd mamut(cant remember the name of the race and yes i know i suck). But the bosses were very easy, the easiest i have seen. i died 2 or 3 times.

My opinion is that SFAd is better, even when its not a "real" SF game, many others think that and still choose it as better

[Mr. Krystal]

I disagree strongly that WW was the worst Zelda game in the series. I personally enjoyed it. It's not fair to say, "It wasn't like OoT, therefore, it's the worst ever." What kind of logic is that?! Secondly, the worst game in the Zelda franchise was The Wand of Ganelon for the Phillips CD-i.

Star Fox Adventures was radically different, and I wouldn't be near as interested in it if it weren't for a certain character, but I enjoy it each and every time I play it, dispite its faults.

Both of the games were fun in their own way and I enjoyed both. I actually enjoyed the huge expanse of ocean that was in WW. It gave you stuff to do even if you'd been there before.

There's only one real measure of whether a game is good or not, and that is how much fun it is to play.

[Lord O'Donnell]

Yes i agree with you with the fact tht both games are good i was only showing the general opinion from both games, and also how i felt when playing them. I honestly have both, just a few days ago i get adventures (on saturday to be exact).

But honestly, traveling in the damn ocean is boring. I dont know which zelda you are talking about, to be honest i was talking about the main storyline (which is short, or at least the story line that has benn for the main consoles: N64 and Cube) and the WW was too short i was expecting something else, or at least the search for the triforce colud be harder. The battle with Ganondorf is great, i hope to see anything like that in the twilight princess.

I made this poll because i saw something like that at school, sorry if anyone get upset with my opinion, but "The worst of each franchise" is not something that i said you can find that critics in the net and in zelda web sites, and other forums.

[TakeWalker]

I'm voting for WW even though I never played it and wasn't too interested in it to begin with, because it's a vote against Adventures. I still possess an unspeakable hate for that game.

[Sol-Ratcht Saporro]

Since I haven't got around to playing WW yet, I'll just stick with what I'm familiar with. But, I heard WW had some pretty high reviews. I guess maybe they don't like the new type of graphics for the game? I dunno, but, I'm still gonna play it.

[Guest Krysader]

...

Dwight said it for me. Perfectly.

So... Yeah. I like both games. Though, if it wasn't for a certaint charater... I might've not liked Adventures as much. :x

[EvolutionSFox]

Adventures, for one... I hate Zelda. Two, the adventure-genre that Star Fox took on was awesome. Three, it introduced Krystal.