Jump to content

post 64 mentioning taboo


14432

Recommended Posts

Is it now officially Taboo to mention any post 64content now since the release of zero practically obliterated the timeline? 

 

I will say Krystal and i will wait till somebody yells at me for mentioning it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BAWWW, DON'T EVER MENTION HER AGAIN!!!!

But seriously Nintendo is unpredictable, we don't know what they'll do with the franchise at this point.  They could retell the 64-Command canon, they could use the post-64 content but in a new way, they could make a new canon without any of the post 64 content, or maybe they thought Zero didn't do well enough and discontinue the series.

But even if Zero overwrites the old canon I don't see why a discussion about it would be taboo, since a discussion about the snes canon isn't.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it's not Taboo.

It's part of the history.

And the old timeline has the best furry waifu.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I've said before, Adventures and Assault are still canon.

Think of Zero as a prequel to Adventures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SF Alba said:

As I've said before, Adventures and Assault are still canon.

Think of Zero as a prequel to Adventures.

i constantly fear that mentioning the old timeline will recieve the same taboo as mentioning command

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Numbers, if mentioning old timelines (or even Command) was taboo, you wouldn't be hearing a word about SNES canon, or how supposedly great Fara Phoenix was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2016 at 8:35 AM, That Ain't Falco said:

Numbers, if mentioning old timelines (or even Command) was taboo, you wouldn't be hearing a word about SNES canon, or how supposedly great Fara Phoenix was.

i am always expecting someone to throw me out for mentioning the old timelines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, why? There's no tension or drama about this stuff, even. It kinda seems like you're trying to start something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, That Ain't Falco said:

Yeah, why? There's no tension or drama about this stuff, even. It kinda seems like you're trying to start something.

No i'm just not sure 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, unoservix said:

yeah okay but why?

will the post 64 and snes stuff get the same taboo status as mentioning starfox command?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't a taboo with mentioning SFC.

It just sucks and everyone likes to rant on it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. Orange said:

There isn't a taboo with mentioning SFC.

It just sucks and everyone likes to rant on it.

 

exactly, i am expecting people to rant about the old timelines

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah but, for the third time, why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 14432 said:

you guess why

My guess is you want to cause some sort of drama, or expecting people to lambast you for the mere mention of older games. This thread and the question you pose is pointless since the majority of if not all discussions I've seen of the older games like SNES canon and now the post-64 timeline have been healthy and respectful. Nothing "Taboo" about any of this. Please stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 14432 said:

you guess why

How about no. If someone asks you a question, you'll get a LOT farther by answering it instead being all coy and acting like they should know.

A person wouldn't ask a question like this if they already had an idea why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 14432 said:

you guess why

It sounds like you're trying to get us to give you a good reason why, rather than having your own reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 14432 said:

you guess why

0AOI1qX.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's move this to the Rec and have a guessing game!

I guess it's because you think that the new timelines with throw out the old timelines on the inference that the old sucks.

I don't know 'bout y'all but I'mma have some fun. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it's because of the mating habits of the Australian frilled-neck lizard, in which female lizards choose their mates on the basis of which one best expresses antipathy towards mediocre Nintendo video games

here is an example of this unusual courtship behavior in action

LoZiop9.jpg

remember ladies, he is single

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dr. Orange said:

Let's move this to the Rec and have a guessing game!

I guess it's because you think that the new timelines with throw out the old timelines on the inference that the old sucks.

I don't know 'bout y'all but I'mma have some fun. 

exactly and people are starting to recognize that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, 14432 said:

exactly and people are starting to recognize that

Ah but my dear Fourteen, you've forgotten!

The old timelines aren't bad like Command. Command was an isolated event with bad story and flow or whatever Rob ranted about back yonder. For the most part the old story line is well written and liked. 

And isn't SFZ supposed to be a prelude to SF:SNES? So in some way the old timeline is still in effect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dr. Orange said:

Ah but my dear Fourteen, you've forgotten!

The old timelines aren't bad like Command. Command was an isolated event with bad story and flow or whatever Rob ranted about back yonder. For the most part the old story line is well written and liked. 

And isn't SFZ supposed to be a prelude to SF:SNES? So in some way the old timeline is still in effect?

Boy, people on reddit are resenting the old timeline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...