unoservix Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 21 hours ago, 14432 said: space battleships as in spaceships either built in the configuration of a naval batleship or otherwise converted from an ancient naval battleship what is the point of doing that? i mean doing that is dumb just on its surface but putting that aside, who cares about that in a game where you control a space fighter being flown by a guy who looks like a Zootopia extra shooting robots and things? maybe you should just go back to watching Space Battleship Yamato? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 For fuck sake, enough numbers Since the day you joined you've been causing so much trouble with your Crossover hells and "Theories". Everyone here on this thread and chat (and by god you know who I mean by those on chat)is tired of this already. Hell, even people like Lord Shen have mentioned this before but you literally ignore it all the way and kept shoving your "Theories" and Fannons down our throats. It is just like what Commander Red and Rusavok kept saying you're nothing more than a troll who "looks for trouble" as SF Alba implies it. No one in Star Fox Community wants to hear another theory of yours anymore especially when comes out in the same exact result which leads me posting that GIF of the abandon thread guy, which in this case should place here right now. Seriously though. It's time stop now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Monroe Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 space battleships as in spaceships either built in the configuration of a naval batleship or otherwise converted from an ancient naval battleshiphttp://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/starfox/images/0/08/SFZ-Salvadora.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160427052635 >Topside gun turrets for days >raised bridge tower how is this not a literal space battleship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gestalt Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 [Robert Monroe:] > Go play Mass Effect 3 and talk sass to the Starchild or something instead or, or make inspired space furry content and mask the source material for greater appeal and a fresh audience That said, I find a raw, naked melding of inspiration appealing on some levels. [Rusakov:] > Must_be_a_troll.jpg I will die on this hill: annoying people who cause disruption can do so without the hidden motives that trolling implies. [Quadroline:] > no_one_cares.txt On the contrary, the boards haven't been this lit in weeks. He's the hero we deserve, but not the one we need right now. So we'll hunt him for now, because he can take it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusakov Posted August 20, 2016 Share Posted August 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Quadroline said: For fuck sake, enough numbers Since the day you joined you've been causing so much trouble with your Crossover hells and "Theories". Everyone here on this thread and chat (and by god you know who I mean by those on chat)is tired of this already. Hell, even people like Lord Shen have mentioned this before but you literally ignore it all the way and kept shoving your "Theories" and Fannons down our throats. It is just like what Commander Red and Rusavok kept saying you're nothing more than a troll who "looks for trouble" as SF Alba implies it. No one in Star Fox Community wants to hear another theory of yours anymore especially when comes out in the same exact result which leads me posting that GIF of the abandon thread guy, which in this case should place here right now. Seriously though. It's time stop now. Those are my thoughts too. But I didn't know whether I should have posted them. Also grammar nazi correction: my screen name is Rusakov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 6 hours ago, Quadroline said: Spoiler For fuck sake, enough numbers Since the day you joined you've been causing so much trouble with your Crossover hells and "Theories". Everyone here on this thread and chat (and by god you know who I mean by those on chat)is tired of this already. Hell, even people like Lord Shen have mentioned this before but you literally ignore it all the way and kept shoving your "Theories" and Fannons down our throats. It is just like what Commander Red and Rusavok kept saying you're nothing more than a troll who "looks for trouble" as SF Alba implies it. No one in Star Fox Community wants to hear another theory of yours anymore especially when comes out in the same exact result which leads me posting that GIF of the abandon thread guy, which in this case should place here right now. Seriously though. It's time stop now. Quad bringing the fire like the second ice age 'round the corner. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
14432 Posted August 21, 2016 Author Share Posted August 21, 2016 7 hours ago, Robert Monroe said: space battleships as in spaceships either built in the configuration of a naval batleship or otherwise converted from an ancient naval battleshiphttp://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/starfox/images/0/08/SFZ-Salvadora.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160427052635 >Topside gun turrets for days >raised bridge tower how is this not a literal space battleship it can't land on water Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusakov Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 7 minutes ago, 14432 said: it can't land on water Jesus Christ. I'm not even debating you and I'm getting annoyed with you. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unoservix Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 33 minutes ago, 14432 said: it can't land on water a very important thing to be able to do in outer space, yes 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
14432 Posted August 21, 2016 Author Share Posted August 21, 2016 2 hours ago, unoservix said: a very important thing to be able to do in outer space, yes whe there's a planet with barely any land on it and you have a massive ship not a small fighter (Aquas) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 8 hours ago, 14432 said: whe there's a planet with barely any land on it and you have a massive ship not a small fighter (Aquas) ...you send down the small excavation ship. Duh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 22 hours ago, Quadroline said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unoservix Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 12 hours ago, 14432 said: whe there's a planet with barely any land on it and you have a massive ship not a small fighter (Aquas) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusakov Posted August 21, 2016 Share Posted August 21, 2016 So much good snark... so few likes allowed to give... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
14432 Posted August 21, 2016 Author Share Posted August 21, 2016 7 hours ago, Dr. Orange said: ...you send down the small excavation ship. Duh. i'm talking about landing a large spaceship without the risk of it sinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 2 hours ago, 14432 said: i'm talking about landing a large spaceship without the risk of it sinking Why would you land a space ship? All spaceships are too large to land, hence why almost in every Scifi film or show of this decade; The ships are built in space and are only in space. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Monroe Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 23 hours ago, 14432 said: it can't land on water WOW WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT a space battleship doesn't fucking literally ahve to be the Yamato to be a SPACE BATTLESHIP by the way. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
14432 Posted August 22, 2016 Author Share Posted August 22, 2016 2 hours ago, Dr. Orange said: Why would you land a space ship? All spaceships are too large to land, hence why almost in every Scifi film or show of this decade; The ships are built in space and are only in space. 57 minutes ago, Robert Monroe said: WOW WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT a space battleship doesn't fucking literally ahve to be the Yamato to be a SPACE BATTLESHIP by the way. ahem: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 1 hour ago, Robert Monroe said: a space battleship doesn't fucking literally ahve to be the Yamato to be a SPACE BATTLESHIP by the way. 1 hour ago, Robert Monroe said: a space battleship doesn't fucking literally ahve to be the Yamato to be a SPACE BATTLESHIP by the way. 1 hour ago, Robert Monroe said: BOI DAT BATTLESHIP DON'T NEED BE BE NONE OF DAT YAMATO WATER SPACE SHIT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unoservix Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 srsly tho remind me why we're supposed to care whether Cornerian space capital ships can operate on water? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArwingFan Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 Haven't seen a show like this around these parts since forever. But what point are you even trying to make 14432? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
14432 Posted August 22, 2016 Author Share Posted August 22, 2016 3 hours ago, ArwingFan said: Haven't seen a show like this around these parts since forever. But what point are you even trying to make 14432? Starfox is slightly cartoony right? Xortberg said that i'm taking advantage of that claim by putting a ship of odd design into it. 3 hours ago, unoservix said: srsly tho remind me why we're supposed to care whether Cornerian space capital ships can operate on water? This is not compulsory for all cornerian ships, I just had this idea for a class of cornerian ship that takes inspiration from "Space Battleship Yamato" (the idea of a spaceships that looks like an old fashioned battleships). It's suppose to be a "small yet insanely overpowered" ship class but are a rare sight as only a limited number of these vessels would be constructed and that they're usually sent on off-system voyages that usually last about 12 months. The first one being built before the lylat war and launched the moment Corneria was invaded By Andross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xortberg Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 Listen, dude, rather than making threads trying to convince us that these alternate universes and shit should happen, just go write a fanfic or something. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Monroe Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 I literally have no fucking idea what the fuck you're trying to say anymore. Let's review! You start the thread with some grimdark bullshit. Then everyone tells you why it is in fact bullshit You then say well if its so cartoony then there should be LITERAL SPACE BATTLESHIPS At which point I point out yes, actually, that sort of shit is in some form or another, in Starfox. There are the classic "spaceships designed like a warship" types that have graced every space opera anime since 1973, there's the fact the Greatfox can in fact LAND IN WATER. Oh, and there's Aquarosa too. http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/starfox/images/5/5f/SFZ-Aquarosa.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160427052456 Which is a giant fucking battleship/space station/whatever ALSO IN THE WATER And you reply with a picture of the Yamato. Ok? You are indeed confirming that yes Starfox is cartoony anime trash and therefore not fit for your grimdark reality? (Ignoring the fact that Yamato was often pretty dark itself...) I don't know what the fuck you're trying to say. I feel like I'm being rused here. That or your definition of a space battleship is so narrow that unless Starfox LITERALLY HAS THE YAMATO then it doesn't count and therefore isn't cartoony enough?? I don't even know any more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patch93 Posted August 22, 2016 Share Posted August 22, 2016 Why the hell do so many people want Star Fox to be grimdark? It's a Nintendo series about animal muppet aliens who fly starfighters. Could the franchise use more depth and better story-telling? Certainly, but it certainly doesn't need to try to be edgy to accomplish that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now