Jump to content

Wolfen, Arwing or Landmaster?


X-Gamer

If you had a chance (and only one chance) to drive, examine, etc. a vehicle, would it be a Wolfen, Arwing or Landmaster?  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. If you had a chance (and only one chance) to drive, examine, etc. a vehicle, would it be a Wolfen, Arwing or Landmaster?

    • Wolfen
      6
    • Arwing
      17
    • Landmaster
      2


Recommended Posts

I'd kill to fly, or even better, own a Wolfen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very hard choice I'm going for the landmaster as I've always wanted to drive a M1Abrams ,but theres the arwing and wolfen too then for flying.......  considering the arwing is slower and proably easier to manuver I'd probalby go with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like either a Wolfen 2, or the Arwing from Star Fox 2 where it converts to walker mode.

I've never played starfox 2 before, but that arwing sounds pretty cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never played starfox 2 before, but that arwing sounds pretty cool.

  ever seen a veritech fighter it's like that but with a fighter and battloid only mode no guardian mode and it's a 2 legged walker no hands and not humanoid. but still a nice idea.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  ever seen a veritech fighter it's like that but with a fighter and battloid only mode no guardian mode and it's a 2 legged walker no hands and not humanoid. but still a nice idea.

Personally, I hated the walker mode. It just seemed so... out of place...

On topic, Arwing, specifically, the Assault model (Arwing Mk. 3).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wolfen. Speed and power.

Everything else is just compensation for lack of these two.  :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wolfen. Speed and power.

Everything else is just compensation for lack of these two.  :wink:

Yeah, but I think it might be just too fast. It's like choosing between a hot car (by hot, I mean it's in style/ cool looking, etc.) and a race car. The hot car has more control. I'd like to be cruising, not racing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but I think it might be just too fast. It's like choosing between a hot car (by hot, I mean it's in style/ cool looking, etc.) and a race car. The hot car has more control. I'd like to be cruising, not racing.

You have a point, but in combat it's nice (for me, at least) to have raw power that you have to tame yourself through control and technique, rather then trading that power away so that it's easier to control. That way, you always have that extra ability if you push the envelope.

And I usually compare the Wolfen to an F-14, and the Arwing to an F-18. It makes sense to me, at least...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm you know that' actually makes the arwing better right? (especially if you include the super hornet) I've heard from a actual apache helecopter pilot that  the good apache pilots were good gamers as teenagers IMagine that :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

umm you know that' actually makes the arwing better right? (especially if you include the super hornet) I've heard from an actual apache helecopter pilot that  the good apache pilots were good gamers as teenagers IMagine that :P

Apparently, gaming hones the reflexes and quickens reaction time. I can see how.

and I still think that calling the Arwing/F-18 "better" is a matter of opinion. I have a grudge against the Hornet for taking over the Navy Air Arm. But that's another discussion. Wolfen FTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a point, but in combat it's nice (for me, at least) to have raw power that you have to tame yourself through control and technique, rather then trading that power away so that it's easier to control. That way, you always have that extra ability if you push the envelope.

And I usually compare the Wolfen to an F-14, and the Arwing to an F-18. It makes sense to me, at least...

The F-14 was designed as an air superioity fighter, while the F-18 was a general purpose fighter, and thus had to compromise a bit.

I remember a guy once describet the F-14 vs F-18 as:

F-18 flys like a Porsche 911 drives, very nimble, light and quick. In general turns a little tighter than the F-14 but not as fast.

F-14 flys like a Corvette drives. A big, very powerful muscle car. Not as nimble, but still pretty agile for a large titanium beast.

If that is the case, then the F-14/Wolfen is more my kind of machine. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

F-18 flys like a Porsche 911 drives, very nimble, light and quick. In general turns a little tighter than the F-14 but not as fast.

F-14 flys like a Corvette drives. A big, very powerful muscle car. Not as nimble, but still pretty agile for a large titanium beast.

LOOL - in that case, I need an fighter like the Su-27 ;) It would kick the Arwing's as well as the Wolfen's ass xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I had to go with the Wolfen, I think its a sharper looking (literally) ship, and I love the color scheme compared to the Arwing, though they all look nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

LOOL - in that case, I need an fighter like the Su-27 ;) It would kick the Arwing's as well as the Wolfen's ass xD

any plane not made in america,Britain or isrealis junk nowadays.

by the way has  anyone heard of the f-15 that landed  with only one wing intact?

now that's a durable aircraft :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

any plane not made in america,Britain or isrealis junk nowadays.

by the way has  anyone heard of the f-15 that landed  with only one wing intact?

now that's a durable aircraft :P

That is not true - there are MANY planes, civil or military, which are far better than comparable planes from the US. And there are even some planes, which don't even have a "US-version" of that. For example the Soviet (now Ukrainian) Antonov 124. Some of these planes are even used by the NASA to get their space rockets from A to B, because non US plane could transport them in one piece.

And Great Britain doesn't even have their own planes anymore, because they develop airplanes together with other EU countries. The Eurofighter is also better than comrapable multirole combat aircrafts (F/A-18, Mig-29 or Dassault Rafale).

Japan and China do also try, to build their own jets, but they still can't manage to reach the standard of EU or US jets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

any plane not made in america,Britain or isrealis junk nowadays.

JAS Gripen? Eurofighter Typhoon? Not what I'd call junk exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...