Jump to content

Can you make or break this case?


Sableye

Recommended Posts

And Judge 2.

In that case, do me a favor and tell me beforehand who you are speaking as. I get confused easily.  :lol:

e.x. post:

(Prosecutor)

Objection! Contradiction is this....

And the objection wierdoutinfo made, was that post made to be against the defense or with the defense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case, do me a favor and tell me beforehand who you are speaking as. I get confused easily.  :lol:

e.x. post:

(Prosecutor)

Objection! Contradiction is this....

And the objection wierdoutinfo made, was that post made to be against the defense or with the defense?

That's illrelvant.

Wait until the trail really begins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[cut out image]

*plays Cornered music* 

The the testimony you gave, there was plenty of contractions to the evidence here.

There was only ONE airbag on the scene of crime.

And also, people can't drink while working.

And the crime scene was an skyscraper, not his house.

And those 5 people were around in the building that time near his OFFICE!

And the letter started with Dear Boss, but was cutted off.

And there was no cut in his skull. It was his heart!

And there was no bottle, empty or what not!

None of this was mentioned in the OP. How can he possibly give a good defense without this information? :S This is not a very good game.

Also, dude, hotlinking is SO not cool. It isn't against the rules, but it's good internet etiquette not to steal others' bandwidth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's illrelvant.

Wait until the trail really begins.

It hasn't began yet? OKay... I guess I'll wait. Still kinda confused though. sorry.  :?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of this was mentioned in the OP. How can he possibly give a good defense without this information? :S This is not a very good game.

Also, dude, hotlinking is SO not cool. It isn't against the rules, but it's good internet etiquette not to steal others' bandwidth.

The skill i used is good inference from

the first post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think she means that the evidence you showed on your objection was more descriptive than the one on ur first post.

i.e. the letter started with dear boss but then was cut off.

You didn't include that in the first post. You just stated that there was a letter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think she means that the evidence you showed on your objection was more descriptive than the one on ur first post.

i.e. the letter started with dear boss but then was cut off.

You didn't include that in the first post. You just stated that there was a letter.

YA I DID.

OBJECTION Overruled.

Oh my bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, I'm stepping here for a little bit. Being a god in your own topic because you are not filling everything will make others leave. Just a recommendation.

Edit: Also, this thing is about to become a RP, if that happens, I'll have to lock it and Sideways will have to approve it in order to place it on the role playing board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright, I'm stepping here for a little bit. Being a god in your own topic because you are not filling everything will make others leave. Just a recommendation.

Edit: Also, this thing is about to become a RP, if that happens, I'll have to lock it and Sideways will have to approve it in order to place it on the role playing board.

Yeah, I agree with this. This is sort of really a RP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...