Kursed Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 Innocent? It has been established in canon that she's vengeful and (heaven forbid) human, whether you like it or not. You shouldn't put her on a pedestal of unrealistic expectations. Sex is natural. If you expect her to have babies, she must have sex, and be sexy. Sorry, that's how sex works. Sex also changes people, it releases the animal instinct.I also agree with Mr. K, but I don't agree with people saying "that's not Krystal" when she's as underdeveloped as she is. We don't know that she isn't a sexy woman. We didn't know she was a vengeful girl until Command. I think that until they stop development of Star Fox we should assume nothing.I have to dissagree comepletely. Krystal does not have to have sex to have babies ever hear of Clones? Clones are not created by sex. we could now go a step further and use Fox's Dna with krystal to create a baby without sexual intercourse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vy'drach Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 While theoretically possible, it could be against Cornerian law, and it's just grasping at straws to have Krystal remain a virgin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kursed Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 While theoretically possible, it could be against Cornerian law, and it's just grasping at straws to have Krystal remain a virgin.even if it's against corenian and/or lylat law there's bound to be a place outside of Lylat where it is allowed they have space travel. they have technolgy we obviously don't know about , but that's going off topic.also even though krystal is a mysteroious character there were certain characteristics given to her that we can clearly see and most likely tell what she would and would not do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share Posted March 19, 2010 Alright I understand everyone and their views for this topic. It's true Krystal was designed to be attractive to a point but in my opinion not to be turned in to a yiff. But this will bot matter to most people. Art is art no matter how you view it. It is up to y'all if you wish to continue this topic. But enought of that. It's also true that Krystal is fictional and not real. When I come across a yiff that resembles Krystal I look at it and say that's not her. But others will think she's a slut. I think everyone may wish to think wgat' they want it's their choice. Some fanart doesn't look like her but some still say "oh it's Krystal" and get along with their lives and don't dawdle to much in the topic. Some appriciate art while others don't, that doesn't mean that they may continue to do it. But no one really cares for an opinion of some guy in the web. Someone even started an anti Krystal yiff campain. But that's his choice I guess. Everyone do as you please and don't hate on other people for their comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kursed Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 Alright I understand everyone and their views for this topic. It's true Krystal was designed to be attractive to a point but in my opinion not to be turned in to a yiff. But this will bot matter to most people. Art is art no matter how you view it. It is up to y'all if you wish to continue this topic. But enought of that. It's also true that Krystal is fictional and not real. When I come across a yiff that resembles Krystal I look at it and say that's not her. But others will think she's a slut. I think everyone may wish to think wgat' they want it's their choice. Some fanart doesn't look like her but some still say "oh it's Krystal" and get along with their lives and don't dawdle to much in the topic. Some appriciate art while others don't, that doesn't mean that they may continue to do it. But no one really cares for an opinion of some guy in the web. Someone even started an anti Krystal yiff campain. But that's his choice I guess. Everyone do as you please and don't hate on other people for their comments. just for the record i'm nto hating anyone i'm just stating resons why my opinion could work out... anyway what's wrong with disliking people who draw Krystal yiff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share Posted March 19, 2010 No that's not what I meant I meant we should do as we please. I'm not mad at you or anyone those are their opinions I can't say anithing to that. Sorry if I made some mad I'm not picking on anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share Posted March 19, 2010 Kursed you did clear many things for other SF-O members but I stand before my opinion "do as you wish" that is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Julius Quasar Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 How do you feel that artist continue to make Krystal yiff?It doesn't bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vy'drach Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 It doesn't bother me. That's actually more anti-yiff than I was expecting from you, Julius. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share Posted March 19, 2010 Funny....lol.....wait what? Yeah well that's fine with me guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kursed Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 Kursed you did clear many things for other SF-O members but I stand before my opinion "do as you wish" that is all.umm I'm not mad or anything I just have nothing more to say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarita Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 I have to dissagree comepletely. Krystal does not have to have sex to have babies ever hear of Clones? Clones are not created by sex. we could now go a step further and use Fox's Dna with krystal to create a baby without sexual intercourse.I'm actually kind of offended that you assume I haven't. I think very carefully about how I word my posts to avoid offending people. I suggest you do the same.Either way, she would have to be implanted with this clone, and carry it to term anyways. Which is just really needless when you're going to use Fox's DNA anyways. Your idea works, but it is impractical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 I have to dissagree comepletely. Krystal does not have to have sex to have babies ever hear of Clones? Clones are not created by sex. we could now go a step further and use Fox's Dna with krystal to create a baby without sexual intercourse.So let me get this straight, assuming she is with fox, and they "love" each other, and want babies....why should they go for cloning instead of the natural thing? Like it or not, a "marriage" has intimacy. Better yet, why would they avoid doing the natural thing?, will sex kill them or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share Posted March 19, 2010 I really don't know Steve but I think this topic has gone waaay of course. I really don't know what to say to the whole clone thing..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matrilwood Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 Their are 3 problems with cloning;Firstly: Making Copies of copies creates errors, the DNA slowly becomes unstable and eventually faulty, if not un-usable. Get a JPEG image and hold down CTRL+SSecondly: The clone would be an exact replica of Krystal or Fox. This would bring evolution to a grinding stand-still, the Fox Race would not adapt to its environment and they would eventually die off. Or in the short term you'll have a whole heap of Foxs and Krystals running around.Thirdly: Where is the fun in asexual procreation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 19, 2010 Author Share Posted March 19, 2010 Their are 3 problems with cloning;Firstly: Making Copies of copies creates errors, the DNA slowly becomes unstable and eventually faulty, if not un-usable. Get a JPEG image and hold down CTRL+SSecondly: The clone would be an exact replica of Krystal or Fox. This would bring evolution to a grinding stand-still, the Fox Race would not adapt to its environment and they would eventually die off. Or in the short term you'll have a whole heap of Foxs and Krystals running around.Thirdly: Where is the fun in asexual procreation?I was totally lost there......were did the whole cloning thing come in to this topic anyway? Sure there's no fun in asexual reproduction and whos got the time to do it? Doing it naturaly is better than cloning that's for sure.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matrilwood Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 Kursed is pro asexual, which suggests to me that she might in fact be a clone, but that's off topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Macdowel Posted March 19, 2010 Share Posted March 19, 2010 well where all humans and we have our little sex moments but its natuarlly but i hate it when people do that but they can't help themselfs and hey can't blame them!@martil why do they call asexaul? they need to use better words then that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 20, 2010 Author Share Posted March 20, 2010 It's a clone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarita Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 well where all humans and we have our little sex moments but its natuarlly but i hate it when people do that but they can't help themselfs and hey can't blame them!@martil why do they call asexaul? they need to use better words then that!Asexuality in regards to humans more or less means lack of (as seen in the use of the "a" prefix) sex. Asexuals do not like sex, they are not physically attracted to people.Asexuals in the sense of everything else is a reference to reproduction without the use of sex. Like starfish. You cut a starfish in to 5 pieces and each piece grows a new starfish.So yeah, they're called asexual because the prefix "a" pretty much means "without" :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matrilwood Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 Asexual often refers to simple life forms that don't need another copy of code to reproduce. Eg germs reproduce asexually. By splitting in half.Anyway swinging back on topic. I can just imagine the Yiff that would result from Krystal having a clone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vrance Movado Posted March 20, 2010 Author Share Posted March 20, 2010 Yes I really don't know how this simple question ended up going into sexual to asexual reproduction, even in to cloning...... That's kinda weird..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarita Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 When you get a bunch of different people with a bunch of different viewpoints, this is what happens. I don't want to think about clone yiff. That's too complicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DRL Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 Yes I really don't know how this simple question ended up going into sexual to asexual reproduction, even in to cloning...... That's kinda weird.....Again I am breaking my own rule about about not posting in this topic, but I knew beforehand my first post here that the topic was going to go to heck at some point. To me it began since those 'logic' fools started back in the rights topic with their 'logic'. You know what I think? They can go and eat their logic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarita Posted March 20, 2010 Share Posted March 20, 2010 I hate to say this, because I really like you DRL, but you're being very disrespectful. If you knew the topic would get an alternate viewpoint than "omg yiff is terrible" and you were not ready to accept these opinions, you should NOT have posted in the topic, and in fact ignored it entirely like you had resolved to do a few pages ago.You can go and eat your humble pie, sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts