Memberlist addition?

[Four-eyed Vulpine]

In the memberlist, how difficult would it be to include an additional column

containing the date each user was last active in the forums?

I would like to sort the list to see the most recently active members at a glance,

and it's a pain to check people's profile summaries individually.

[Geo Stelar]

Nice idea

[Asper Sarnoff]

Not sure if I like that. Often, I only have time to pop by the forum and take a quick look at things, and not to respond. Someone notices I've been on without responding to something they feel is very important, and then all hell breaks loose. 

Though, since the last active date can be found on each ones personal profile, I guess it won't make that much of a difference.

[Geo Stelar]

Though, since the last active date can be found on each ones personal profile, I guess it won't make that much of a difference.

Not to start an argument or anything, but that's his point, ain't it?

He doesn't like looking at people's summaries individually

if you're gonna add that feature I suggest to put it on the 'Who's Online' page.

[Asper Sarnoff]

Not to start an argument or anything, but that's his point, ain't it?

He doesn't like looking at people's summaries individually

if you're gonna add that feature I suggest to put it on the 'Who's Online' page.

Few people really bothered checking peoples userpage for that. If this came, it would be open for everyone to easily see that one's been on, but ignored responding to them at that moment.

[Kursed]

ignored or forgot? as much a i get worked over not having anything to post to here..... I still have to remember that people forget and are busy.

[DZComposer]

The last active shows the last time someone logged in, not the last time they posted.

There is no reason for that to be on the memberlist, as often people log in and just lurk. I personally don't consider lurking to be "active."

[Kursed]

The last active shows the last time someone logged in, not the last time they posted.

There is no reason for that to be on the memberlist, as often people log in and just lurk. I personally don't consider lurking to be "active."

This ones active Is there a way we can  have it so that it doesn't say lurkers are  active?

[DZComposer]

It would require recoding that part of the software. I have no desire to start digging in SMF's php. I have enough things on my to do list already.

[Four-eyed Vulpine]

Okay then.  Just thought I'd ask.

I guess this case is closed.