Do you believe Fox has legit reasons to be in love with Krystal?

[rainfyre66]

I thought it was bros before hoes...

[Robert Monroe]

yes but slippy met krystal there and this is were fox and falco reunited and it was not specil to them!

Fox and Falco had their "special" moment at the end of SFA when Fox let Falco back onto the team.

[Thu'um]

are you hinting that Fox loves Falco or something???  For a couple it shouldn't matter about Falco girlfriend comes first..

hu, never mind that remark but let us not forget that is there any nonliget reason for loveing some one?[

[Samantha Weltzin]

hu, never mind that remark but let us not forget that is there any nonliget reason for loveing some one?[

"Stockholm Syndrome."

Look it up and you will see a non-legit reason to love someone.

[Kursed]

I thought it was bros before hoes...

well if you want to be rude about it yeah you can go that way.

[Thu'um]

"Stockholm Syndrome."

Look it up and you will see a non-legit reason to love someone.

that not love is it but a neutral/ positive and is showing unexplained and totally  unmoral respect for a captor. and love is defined by many things and one could be loved for most anything. have you ever seen Cheers. Well long story short the cranky mean waitress is loved by a hockey player for her sour side. 

[Samantha Weltzin]

that not love is it but a neutral/ positive and is showing unexplained and totally  unmoral respect for a captor. and love is defined by many things and one could be loved for most anything. have you ever seen Cheers. Well long story short the cranky mean waitress is loved by a hockey player for her sour side.

I'm sorry, but I read your post here five times and didn't even understand the spirit of what you were saying. Could you re-phrase that? It doesn't make sense to me.

[Milkyway64]

Julius! Translate!

[Guest Julius Quasar]

that not love is it but a neutral/ positive and is showing unexplained and totally  unmoral respect for a captor. and love is defined by many things and one could be loved for most anything. have you ever seen Cheers. Well long story short the cranky mean waitress is loved by a hockey player for her sour side.

*TRANSLATED*

"That is not love, but rather a neutral thing, or a positive thing, and it's showing an unexplained and totally immoral respect for a captor.  Love is defined by many things, and one could be loved for most anything.  Have you ever seen Cheers?  Well, long story shorty, the cranky mean waitress is loved for her sour side by a hockey player."

ajc3000fox, you gotta realize, "Cheers" is just a TV show, and those have little, if any pertinence to real life...

[Milkyway64]

Excellent work, man!

It is as he says, Cheers is a TV show, and is hardly an accurate source for real life chemistry.

[Robert Monroe]

And thats ignoring the fact morals are subjective from person to person, so you can't really call it "immoral" as if it was an absolute.

[Thu'um]

Never the less it isn't love.

It is as he says, Cheers is a TV show, and is hardly an accurate source for real life chemistry.

ha, things happen like this all the time. my next door neighbor who makes a million dollars in half a year  (radiologist) married an old woman just because he loved how she was so diffrent from him and loved the change in his life.! Weird example i know but if you love some one why do you really need a good reason.

[Robert Monroe]

Never the less it isn't love. ha, things happen like this all the time. my next door neighbor who makes a million dollars in half a year  (radiologist) married an old woman just because he loved how she was so diffrent from him and loved the change in his life.! Weird example i know but if you love some one why do you really need a good reason.

And for those of us firmly rooted in reality, love requires a combination of chemistry, similar interests, and development of relationship over the course of time.

[Thu'um]

ha, reality, we truly need no reason for love. it is love and loving some one is a good enought for love. not matter what the cause of love

[Robert Monroe]

ha, reality, we truly need no reason for love. it is love and loving some one is a good enought for love. not matter what the cause of love

1: This makes no sense

2: You are 14 and have no concept of how animal reproduction or human psychology works

3: Shut up while you are ahead

Love is a very basic and mandatory part of human society and culture. Hell yes it is fvcking needed, it has been a cornerstone of us since the first civilizations. Going beyond that, it has a basis in reproduction, as proper chemistry between lovers often yields better children, which in turn ensures their genes live a little longer, furthering natural selection.

And this is just BASIC stuff. I am not in the mood to combat your ignorance on the subject. So please, shut up with your annoying teenager misconceptions about how the world turns.

[Guest Julius Quasar]

And for those of us firmly rooted in reality, love requires a combination of chemistry, similar interests, and development of relationship over the course of time.

Win

ha, reality, we truly need no reason for love. it is love and loving some one is a good enought for love. not matter what the cause of love

Lose

1: This makes no sense

2: You are 14 and have no concept of how animal reproduction or human psychology works

3: Shut up while you are ahead

Love is a very basic and mandatory part of human society and culture. Hell yes it is fvcking needed, it has been a cornerstone of us since the first civilizations. Going beyond that, it has a basis in reproduction, as proper chemistry between lovers often yields better children, which in turn ensures their genes live a little longer, furthering natural selection.

And this is just BASIC stuff. I am not in the mood to combat your ignorance on the subject. So please, shut up with your annoying teenager misconceptions about how the world turns.

Win again.

[Star Fox Runner]

Fox may or may not have legitimate reasons to love Krystal. The reason we don't know this is because (once again) of the poor writing of the Star Fox franchise. Because the beginning and (depending on the Command ending) end of their relationship all happens between Assault and Command, we don't know what the basis of their relationship was founded on.

It could be anything, they could have matched on deeply personal level, it could be because Fox rescued Krystal in Adventures and she is deeply grateful for it. Hell, good sex might have been the reason why they got together! (Not trying to sound perverted there, but some people DO base relationships on that.)

We won't know because we haven't seen an official story on it yet. If Nintendo ever DOES release an official story on it.

[Thu'um]

1: This makes no sense

2: You are 14 and have no concept of how animal reproduction or human psychology works

3: Shut up while you are ahead

Love is a very basic and mandatory part of human society and culture. Hell yes it is fvcking needed, it has been a cornerstone of us since the first civilizations. Going beyond that, it has a basis in reproduction, as proper chemistry between lovers often yields better children, which in turn ensures their genes live a little longer, furthering natural selection.

And this is just BASIC stuff. I am not in the mood to combat your ignorance on the subject. So please, shut up with your annoying teenager misconceptions about how the world turns.

oi , did i ask for that . dude calm down your geting to pissy. i don't want this to get into a fight. firstly they are video game characters if i recall. secondly they arn't human and could be totaly diffrent then us in chemical compound.l

Fox may or may not have legitimate reasons to love Krystal. The reason we don't know this is because (once again) of the poor writing of the Star Fox franchise. Because the beginning and (depending on the Command ending) end of their relationship all happens between Assault and Command, we don't know what the basis of their relationship was founded on.

It could be anything, they could have matched on deeply personal level, it could be because Fox rescued Krystal in Adventures and she is deeply grateful for it. Hell, good sex might have been the reason why they got together! (Not trying to sound perverted there, but some people DO base relationships on that.)

We won't know because we haven't seen an official story on it yet. If Nintendo ever DOES release an official story on it.

probly best state ment posted on this topic

[Sapphire]

Fox loves Krystal because that's how Nintendo made it :)

[Thu'um]

i said that once but sombody disagreed

[Robert Monroe]

oi , did i ask for that . dude calm down your geting to pissy. i don't want this to get into a fight. firstly they are video game characters if i recall. secondly they arn't human and could be totaly diffrent then us in chemical compound.

They are human in behaviors, not to mention the chemistry between humans and other animals isn't paticularly too different now.

You're just pulling excuses out of your ass now.

[Thu'um]

They are human in behaviors, not to mention the chemistry between humans and other animals isn't paticularly too different now.

You're just pulling excuses out of your ass now.

my ass = your mouth  calm down. yes but they live on a totaly difrent plant in a video game. they could love each other for any number of reasons.

Fox may or may not have legitimate reasons to love Krystal. The reason we don't know this is because (once again) of the poor writing of the Star Fox franchise. Because the beginning and (depending on the Command ending) end of their relationship all happens between Assault and Command, we don't know what the basis of their relationship was founded on.

It could be anything, they could have matched on deeply personal level, it could be because Fox rescued Krystal in Adventures and she is deeply grateful for it. Hell, good sex might have been the reason why they got together! (Not trying to sound perverted there, but some people DO base relationships on that.)

We won't know because we haven't seen an official story on it yet. If Nintendo ever DOES release an official story on it.

read his and come back to me with an anwser

[Robert Monroe]

my ass = your mouth  calm down. yes but they live on a totaly difrent plant in a video game. they could love each other for any number of reasons.  read his and come back to me with an anwser

Kid, you're starting to irritate me with how uppity you're getting. Don't tell me to calm down, especially when you don't heed the advice of others.

Star Fox Runner's post is a non-answer. Its just stating what we already know: Starfox has shitty writing and nothing in the games gives us a straight answer, which brings us the entire POINT of the debate, which is to make assumptions based on what little we do know from the canon. It is, in short hypothesizing, the use of intellectual knowledge on a subject to arrive at a sensible conclusion about something we do not know the actual truth of. This is a founding principle of the scientific method, after all.

And, from my understanding of 1: human psychology (to say Lylatians aren't "human" is bullshit because they act human in every possible way just about), and 2: animal reproduction (which Lylatians are, animals that is, because they certainly aren't plants), I can safely and securely claim that Fox and Krystal, while having the POTENTIAL to have legitimate reasons to love each other, do in fact not have legitimate reasons to love each other.

And before anyone else says it, yes, hurfdurf getting worked up over a Nintendo game. I can see the silliness of it all.

[Milkyway64]

hurfdurf getting worked u-

And before anyone else says it, yes, hurfdurf getting worked up over a Nintendo game. I can see the silliness of it all.

O-oh... :(

[Sapphire]

Kid, you're starting to irritate me with how uppity you're getting. Don't tell me to calm down, especially when you don't heed the advice of others.

Star Fox Runner's post is a non-answer. Its just stating what we already know: Starfox has shitty writing and nothing in the games gives us a straight answer, which brings us the entire POINT of the debate, which is to make assumptions based on what little we do know from the canon. It is, in short hypothesizing, the use of intellectual knowledge on a subject to arrive at a sensible conclusion about something we do not know the actual truth of. This is a founding principle of the scientific method, after all.

And, from my understanding of 1: human psychology (to say Lylatians aren't "human" is bullshit because they act human in every possible way just about), and 2: animal reproduction (which Lylatians are, animals that is, because they certainly aren't plants), I can safely and securely claim that Fox and Krystal, while having the POTENTIAL to have legitimate reasons to love each other, do in fact not have legitimate reasons to love each other.

And before anyone else says it, yes, hurfdurf getting worked up over a Nintendo game. I can see the silliness of it all.

my ass = your mouth  calm down. yes but they live on a totaly difrent plant in a video game. they could love each other for any number of reasons.  read his and come back to me with an anwser

Hey! Robert and ajc3000fox! Chill out guys! No need to start a fight over such a little thing! Chill! :)