Homosexual Marriage [at Argentina]

[Sarita]

Actually taking the sperm from a donnor and putting it in a woman's uterus is in-vitro fertilization, not gene splicing. Gene splicing is exactly what it says on the tin: splicing genes together. Which, in the case of reproduction, is not a terribly smart way to produce offspring, as intercourse ensures that only the strongest and healthiest sperm succeed.

And animals aren't really an arguement as animals lack the psychological attatchements (for the most part) of romantic relationships. They're just fvcking because they're animals.

That's not what I was talking about though. I meant actually removing the genes from the donor and replacing them. (Yes I did realize how ridiculous this sounds after I posted, but  swear I remember hearing somewhere that this could be done.)

But you make a good point either way. :P

[Robert Monroe]

But that still gives thequestion a 'Yes' answer.

It does, but it by proxy gives the impression that romantic relationships between homosexuals can not exist as the only animalistic justification for homosexuality is being a horny bastard who humps whatever is nearby  :trollface:

[Guest DRL]

It does, but it by proxy gives the impression that romantic relationships between homosexuals can not exist as the only animalistic justification for homosexuality is being a horny bastard who humps whatever is nearby 

lol, time for the 'I am not mad,

just dissapointed' image.

[Robert Monroe]

lol, time for the 'I am not mad,

just dissapointed' image.

Hey, didn't say I agreed with that impression  :trollface:

[Guest DRL]

Hey, didn't say I agreed with that impression 

lol