Jump to content

No. Ko., oh no!


Guest Julius Quasar

Recommended Posts

Fixed. becuse I use Aristotle's

difintion of 'Aristocracy', and this

would not be so.

But true. I absolutely depiste corporativism.

It is the anti-socialist ideal, and it directly

conflicts with our goal. Furthermore, it is

an inneficient system, because only a tiny

fraction would get the benefits of everything.

Well technically an aristocracy is simply rule by the best. The wealthy are the ones in power. Used to be you inherited that power, but then the rise of the middle class came and now they have become what they once stood against, albeit in a different form.

And then their children again inherit this power. IRONY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well technically an aristocracy is simply rule by the best. The wealthy are the ones in power. Used to be you inherited that power, but then the rise of the middle class came and now they have become what they once stood against, albeit in a different form.

Yes, but Aristotle never defined

EXACTLY 'what' was 'the best'.

As far as we know, the 'Aristocracy'

of previous times was nothing more

than an 'Olygarchy' (the nobles used

their money and resources to help

themselves, after all.) however they

used the term Aristocracy, as if to

mean 'we are the best' (but I differ.)

And then their children again inherit this power. IRONY.

The Olygarchy became the

Burgueois. Then it become

the large-scale industrialist/corporative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...