DZComposer Posted February 3, 2011 Author Share Posted February 3, 2011 I need to fix that on the gameserver. IPB doesn't give me the option to whitelist servers from serving scripts as images, and it is a security risk to disable that globally. EDIT: FIXED! Go to your stats page and get the new image URL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRedFox8 Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 About how much extra is it for the chat feature? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DZComposer Posted February 3, 2011 Author Share Posted February 3, 2011 5 simultaneous users: included with IPB license (but pretty damn useless) 20 simultaneous users: $20/year 50 simultaneous users: $30/year 250 simultaneous users: $80/year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"User" Posted February 3, 2011 Share Posted February 3, 2011 5 simultaneous users: included with IPB license (but pretty damn useless) 20 simultaneous users: $20/year 50 simultaneous users: $30/year 250 simultaneous users: $80/year I'll throw in $20 to make it happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Zorro de la Estrella Posted February 4, 2011 Share Posted February 4, 2011 EDIT: Nevermind, it went back to normal now. Weird still! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asper Sarnoff Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Doesn't seem like the ability to run spell-checks on your posts survived the move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"User" Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Doesn't seem like the ability to run spell-checks on your posts survived the move. I'm not sure if a lot people actually used that feature, I used FireFox's built in spellchecker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fox1235 Posted February 10, 2011 Share Posted February 10, 2011 Hey, am I suppose to be not allowed to post on the "how do I" board because I'm trying to figure out how reputation feature on the profile works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asper Sarnoff Posted February 11, 2011 Share Posted February 11, 2011 I'm not sure if a lot people actually used that feature, I used FireFox's built in spellchecker. I did. and several other seems like they could possibly benefit from using it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DZComposer Posted February 11, 2011 Author Share Posted February 11, 2011 IPB's position on spell check is that since browsers have it built-in, they don't need to do it. That's mostly true, save for IE, which doesn't have one by default. For IE, there is this adon: http://www.iespell.com/ Seriously, though, if any of you are using IE I have to ask why you keep torturing yourself. Get a real browser like Firefox or Opera, both of which have spell check. Many sites, SFO included, will also look better since those browsers actually follow the CSS standards, which IE doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 Please enable HTML. It makes embeds and my signature easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"User" Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 Please enable HTML. It makes embeds and my signature easier. I believe that was disabled for security related concerns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 I believe that was disabled for security related concerns. Yeah, I figured as much. Still... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRedFox8 Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 I think why people HAVE to use IE because they are afraid to try something new. Not saying that for the entire IE population, but I think that's a good portion of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 I think why people HAVE to use IE because they are afraid to try something new. Not saying that for the entire IE population, but I think that's a good portion of it. It's actually probably because they're too lazy to actually go and find a better browser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 It was mainly That I wanted to Keep extra space in my hard-drive.... <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf Posted February 12, 2011 Share Posted February 12, 2011 It was mainly That I wanted to Keep extra space in my hard-drive.... Man, your computer must be from the 80's or something... Firefox 3.6 System Requirements Windows Minimum Hardware Pentium 233 MHz (Recommended: Pentium 500 MHz or greater)64 MB RAM (Recommended: 128 MB RAM or greater)52 MB hard drive space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DZComposer Posted February 13, 2011 Author Share Posted February 13, 2011 Your second image was over 200px tall, which is why IPB rejected it. HTML is disabled for security reasons, and will not be enabled. Save that second image to your local machine, resize it in an image editor, upload it somewhere and try again. Also note that there is a byte limit to how big sigs can be at ~500kB, so you may want to save it as a gif or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf Posted February 13, 2011 Share Posted February 13, 2011 Your second image was over 200px tall, which is why IPB rejected it. HTML is disabled for security reasons, and will not be enabled. Save that second image to your local machine, resize it in an image editor, upload it somewhere and try again. Also note that there is a byte limit to how big sigs can be at ~500kB, so you may want to save it as a gif or something. Aha, so there's no way to use IBP's code to re-size it like on the other board, e.g. [img height=480 width=720? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sniper Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 not sure if this is a problem or not, but my profile says "active posts: 717" and in the forums it says "posts 420" is there a difference? or is this a bug? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoctorAllosaurus Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 not sure if this is a problem or not, but my profile says "active posts: 717" and in the forums it says "posts 420" is there a difference? or is this a bug? "Active posts" counts the rec-room stuff while "Posts" does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf Posted February 24, 2011 Share Posted February 24, 2011 "Active posts" counts the rec-room stuff while "Posts" does not. That explains where 538 of my posts went... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sniper Posted February 25, 2011 Share Posted February 25, 2011 lol ok I was wondering about that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now