Harlow Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 Well, I really like anthro, I have nothing against that, it's a fun way of creating characters. I personally think disguising is a bit too much, but I don't care that much. I think it's the ones who are only for the smut are the ones who are spoiling hte fandom. But, as Asper said, they're always going to be haters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DZComposer Posted June 11, 2011 Share Posted June 11, 2011 This thread is descending into ad hominem attacks by multiple parties. Stop it or lock it. :lock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabre Posted June 12, 2011 Share Posted June 12, 2011 Well, I really like anthro, I have nothing against that, it's a fun way of creating characters. I personally think disguising is a bit too much, but I don't care that much. I think it's the ones who are only for the smut are the ones who are spoiling hte fandom. But, as Asper said, they're always going to be haters... Not really. You can be into smut and not be an arse about it. Much like gays and BDSM, you probly wouldn't know who is into what. It's not the ones who are into smut, rather the ones who force that smut on others. I hate to say this, but take user. It would a be reasonable to assume if he is not furry just for smut, it is at least a large part of the appeal, but he doesn't derail every thread with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"User" Posted June 12, 2011 Share Posted June 12, 2011 I hate to say this, but take user. It would a be reasonable to assume if he is not furry just for smut, it is at least a large part of the appeal, but he doesn't derail every thread with it. Yeah you'd be right about that - at least when I first started to get into the fandom just after I finished college. I'm not the same person I used to be though when it comes to that and thus I'm not afraid to say it. I was a completely different person at the time. And I'll have to agree with you on that when it comes to most furries. Over the years I've met tons of people online who have initially claimed they have had no appeal in that kind of material but a lot of the time it comes out sooner or later that they have a sexual appeal nonetheless to anthros - it's one of the biggest reasons (if not the biggest) for the explosion of new furries in the past several years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sluggsnipa Posted June 13, 2011 Share Posted June 13, 2011 LOL,I miss anything? :trollface: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted June 16, 2011 Share Posted June 16, 2011 I'm Amazed. Someone goes and creates a website, and does a horrible job at it. I mean, If you're going to make a website, No matter what it is, DO A SPELL CHECK!!! And Responding to too long E-mails with a TL:DR. REALLY?!?! But Saying all the anger I have with this website will just fill a page. And I've been having a debate with this person and he just said. One billion people lack access to clean drinking water. 3.3 billion people - over half the population of the world - live at risk of contracting Malaria, an easily and cheaply treatable disease, but still one million people a year die from it. 2.5 million people die each year from Diarrhea propogated through contaminated water sources. What do you do about this? You spend your time posting on the internet about My Little Pony and defending people that view animals as objects of sexual pleasure. You are terrible. Yours in Christ J I'm just amazed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star Fox Runner Posted June 25, 2011 Share Posted June 25, 2011 And I've been having a debate with this person and he just said. One billion people lack access to clean drinking water. 3.3 billion people - over half the population of the world - live at risk of contracting Malaria, an easily and cheaply treatable disease, but still one million people a year die from it. 2.5 million people die each year from Diarrhea propogated through contaminated water sources. What do you do about this? You spend your time posting on the internet about My Little Pony and defending people that view animals as objects of sexual pleasure. You are terrible. Yours in Christ J I'm just amazed. :blink: I agree with you, what does THAT have anything to do with furries? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 :blink: I agree with you, what does THAT have anything to do with furries? Exactly, and he goes on for a couple more E-mails about this. I don't know if I want to show them or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"User" Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 I agree with you, what does THAT have anything to do with furries? The guy who replied to High portrayed furries in a negative lite by throwing up the whole sex aspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Alright I have Here a E-Mail of why he made this website. The difference is that I have worked to expose these people to the world at large for what they are, and what they are interested in: sexual activity with animals. I have been phenomenally successful at doing this, making the world an incrementally better place in the process. However, you wallow in this filth and defend them. Even if you are not engaged in it yourself (which I highly doubt, but I will be charitable for now) you are complicit. You do not get to pick and choose, and so since you are actively defending them you are directly and equally culpable for the worst of their vile behaviour. This is how you choose to spend your time - arguing on the internet on behalf of those who would rape dogs and cats - ignorant to the layers of western privilege that allow you to do so in the first place, while one billion people do not even have access to clean drinking water. ... All I have to say is that he has NO CLUE of what he is talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xortberg Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 I think he knows EXACTLY what he's talking about. That email was pretty much custom designed to troll someone, and I'd be willing to bet every bit of ignorance in it was put there on purpose for that purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 I think he knows EXACTLY what he's talking about. I'm still on the Edge with that. He is making accusations without proof or information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xortberg Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 And thus trolling. Like I said, there is lots of ignorance in their, but I'm willing to bet that every bit of it is intentional. That's what trolls do. Look at Troll Science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Orange Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 And thus trolling. Like I said, there is lots of ignorance in their, but I'm willing to bet that every bit of it is intentional. That's what trolls do. Look at Troll Science. Well after the 6 E-mails he sent me, Which he was obviously serious, this just tells me that he is Unprofessional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkyway64 Posted June 28, 2011 Author Share Posted June 28, 2011 ITT High Executor got trolled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drasiana Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 People were still unsure that this thing was a troll? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Cool website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabre Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Alright I have Here a E-Mail of why he made this website. The difference is that I have worked to expose these people to the world at large for what they are, and what they are interested in: sexual activity with animals. I have been phenomenally successful at doing this, making the world an incrementally better place in the process. However, you wallow in this filth and defend them. Even if you are not engaged in it yourself (which I highly doubt, but I will be charitable for now) you are complicit. You do not get to pick and choose, and so since you are actively defending them you are directly and equally culpable for the worst of their vile behaviour. This is how you choose to spend your time - arguing on the internet on behalf of those who would rape dogs and cats - ignorant to the layers of western privilege that allow you to do so in the first place, while one billion people do not even have access to clean drinking water. ... All I have to say is that he has NO CLUE of what he is talking about. I could translate and pick appart this e-mail, but I don't think there is any need at this point. The interesting thing though is the remark about western privilage, and the use of charity fallacy I forget the name of. (appeal to emotion?) It seems very out of place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thu'um Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 i don't see how any one could be offended by this website. i thought it was hilarous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
"User" Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Xort already ripped him apart in a "professionally done" debate email (which I saw) and the best the guy could really do in a reply was not even address any of his points and basically said that it was tl;dr. In short, he's not worth the time for any real serious debate and/or doesn't even care to be drawn out into a long process - preferring rather just to stick to initial hard trolling. Don't waste your time with this guy as he's obviously not worthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts